Warner Brothers 100th Anniversary silver coin (2023 Royal Dutch Mint)
The New Zealand Mint has done a sterling job of marking the 100th anniversary of one of the giants of Hollywood – Warner Brothers. They’ve done so by concentrating on the studio’s output of iconic movies and television, from the earliest days, to the latest. They aren’t alone in celebrating, however, and surprisingly, it’s the Royal Dutch Mint doing the honours.
It starts off well, with the coin shaped like one of the early Warner Brothers shield logo’s, incorporating the famous WB inscription on it. However, the coin design seems a little too much of a corporate pat-on-the-back, rather than marking what really matters, the productions that emanated from the company. It depicts the Old Warner Brothers Studio, a movie, radio and television production facility sited on Hollywood’s Sunset Boulevard. It’s an important part of the corporation’s heritage, for sure, being the filming location of the first ‘talkie’, the 1927 hit, The Jazz Singer, but it doesn’t make for a coin design that evokes the glorious century long body of work that Warner Brothers have built.
In what is an ever-increasing presence in numismatic circles of late, this one-ounce 0.999 silver coin is issued for Malta, and carries the Mediterranean island’s attractive coat-of-arms on the obverse. We’re huge admirers of this European mint’s output, especially the superb Silver Ducats range, but we feel this is an uninspiring release, missing what celebrations of this Hollywood icon’s centenary should be about. Available now.
Stunning Boring !
Great that Malta is continuing to get in on the numismatic action but this coin is AWFUL!
When you think about all the magic that came from the building over the course of a century, it baffles me that they’d choose the building itself. It may be something to do with the characters and productions being exclusive to the NZ Mint. Compare this one to the Wile E. Coyote coin, and they’re worlds apart. The RDM is one of my favourite mints as well (love those Ducats!), but this one is conceptually off, IMO.